Plain Language Rewriter — Side-by-Side Simplification

Rewrite for Plain Language

Paste your original text on the left. Write your simplified version on the right. Click Analyze to compare readability scores and see highlighted issues. Everything runs in your browser.

Original Text
Simplified Text

Original Text — Issues Highlighted

Passive voice
Long sentence
Jargon
Complex word

Suggestions

What Is a Plain Language Rewriter?

A plain language rewriter is a writing tool that helps you transform complex, jargon-heavy text into clear, accessible prose. The concept is rooted in the plain language movement, which holds that readers should be able to understand a document the first time they read it without needing specialized knowledge or repeated readings. This tool provides a structured workflow for that transformation: paste your original text, identify the specific elements that create complexity, write a simplified version, and measure the improvement with objective readability scores.

Unlike automated paraphrasing tools that reword sentences algorithmically, this plain language rewriter keeps you in control of the rewriting process. The tool's role is diagnostic: it identifies passive voice constructions, flags sentences longer than 20 words, highlights jargon terms that have simpler alternatives, and marks complex words with three or more syllables. You then use these diagnostics to guide your manual rewrite, ensuring that meaning, tone, and nuance are preserved while unnecessary complexity is removed.

The side-by-side layout is central to the tool's design. By placing the original and simplified versions next to each other, you can see the relationship between every change you make and the resulting readability improvement. The score comparison panel shows Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level and Flesch Reading Ease for both versions simultaneously, with a calculated improvement percentage that quantifies how much more accessible your rewrite is.

Why Plain Language Matters

The case for plain language is backed by decades of research and policy. In the United States, the Plain Writing Act of 2010 requires all federal agencies to use plain language in public-facing documents. The European Union's Clear Writing initiative sets similar standards for 24 official languages. The United Kingdom's GOV.UK style guide targets a reading age of 9 years old for government content. These are not suggestions; they are legal requirements driven by evidence that complex writing excludes large segments of the population.

The National Center for Education Statistics reports that 43% of U.S. adults read at a basic or below-basic literacy level. For these readers, a sentence like "The implementation necessitates the utilization of an asynchronous methodology" is functionally unreadable. The plain language equivalent — "Use an async method to set this up" — communicates the same information at a fraction of the cognitive cost. The difference is not intelligence; it is access.

In healthcare, the stakes are life and death. Patients who cannot understand discharge instructions are three times more likely to be readmitted within 30 days. The American Medical Association recommends all patient materials be written at a 6th-grade reading level. The National Institutes of Health and CDC enforce similar standards. When a medication label says "Take with adequate hydration" instead of "Drink a full glass of water," real people misunderstand and get hurt.

In business, plain language directly impacts the bottom line. A Siegel+Gale study found that companies communicating in plain language are perceived as more trustworthy, and customers are 73% more likely to recommend those companies. Internal communications suffer equally: the Literacy Project estimates that poor workplace writing costs U.S. companies $400 billion annually in wasted time, misunderstandings, and errors.

How the Analysis Engine Works

The analysis engine scans the original text for four categories of complexity issues. Each category uses a different detection algorithm and produces specific, actionable suggestions.

Passive Voice Detection scans for patterns where a form of "to be" (is, was, were, are, been, being, be, am) is followed within three words by a past participle. Common patterns include "was written," "is completed," "were given," "has been approved," and "will be reviewed." Passive voice is not grammatically wrong, but it often hides the actor, increases sentence length, and reduces directness. The fix is almost always to identify the actor and make them the subject: "The report was written by the team" becomes "The team wrote the report."

Long Sentence Detection flags any sentence containing more than 20 words. Research from the American Press Institute shows that readers understand 100% of 8-word sentences but only 10% of 43-word sentences. The 20-word threshold sits at the point where comprehension begins declining for general audiences. The suggestion is always the same: split the sentence at a natural break point, typically at a conjunction (and, but, or) or a semicolon.

Jargon Detection checks the text against a dictionary of approximately 60 common jargon terms paired with their plain-language alternatives. Examples include "utilize" (use), "facilitate" (help), "commence" (start), "terminate" (end), "endeavor" (try), "subsequent" (next), "prior to" (before), "in the event that" (if), "with regard to" (about), and "notwithstanding" (despite). These terms are not rare or technical — they are everyday words dressed up in formal clothing. The plain alternatives are always shorter, more direct, and more widely understood.

Complex Word Detection flags words with three or more syllables that are not in the jargon dictionary and are not common proper nouns. These polysyllabic words increase the syllable-per-word ratio that drives most readability formulas. Not all complex words should be replaced — some are necessary for precision — but each one should be evaluated. "Approximately" can become "about." "Demonstrate" can become "show." "Establish" can become "set up." The goal is to use simple words when they carry the same meaning.

The Readability Score Comparison

The score comparison panel calculates two metrics for each version of the text. Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level maps to a U.S. school grade: a score of 8.0 means the text requires an 8th-grade reading level. Flesch Reading Ease produces a 0-100 score where higher is easier, with 60-70 representing standard plain English. Both formulas use the same inputs (average sentence length and average syllables per word) but present the results differently.

The improvement percentage compares the two Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level scores and expresses the reduction as a percentage. If your original text scores grade 14.2 and your simplified version scores grade 7.8, the improvement is 45% — meaning your rewrite reduced the reading level by nearly half. This metric gives you a single number to track your progress and ensures that your simplification efforts produce measurable results rather than subjective impressions.

For content that needs to work alongside A/B testing frameworks, you can use the readability scores from this tool as one variable in your test design: does version A (grade 12) or version B (grade 8) generate more conversions? The answer consistently favors the simpler version in studies across healthcare, e-commerce, and SaaS landing pages. For developers building automated readability pipelines, HeyTensor provides tensor and matrix utilities useful in NLP feature extraction.

Privacy

This plain language rewriter runs entirely in your browser using client-side JavaScript. No text data is transmitted to any server, stored, or shared. There are no cookies, no analytics, and no accounts. Both the original and simplified text remain in your browser's memory and are discarded when you close the tab. The source code is available on GitHub for inspection. For complementary analysis, the main Enhio text analyzer provides word frequency, tone detection, and SEO keyword tools alongside readability scoring.

Check Sentence Complexity

Need detailed scores from all six readability formulas? The complexity checker calculates Flesch, Fog, SMOG, Coleman-Liau, and ARI simultaneously.

Open Complexity Checker

Frequently Asked Questions

What is plain language writing?

Plain language writing communicates information so the intended audience can understand it the first time they read it. It uses short sentences (under 20 words), common words, active voice, and clear structure. The U.S. Plain Writing Act of 2010 requires federal agencies to use plain language in all public documents. Plain language does not mean dumbing down content — it means removing unnecessary complexity while preserving accuracy and meaning.

How does the plain language rewriter detect passive voice?

The tool scans for patterns where a form of "to be" (is, was, were, are, been, being) appears near a past participle (typically ending in -ed, -en, -t, or -wn). Common matches include "was written," "is completed," "were given," and "has been shown." The algorithm checks a window of three words after the "to be" form to catch constructions with adverbs between them, like "was quickly approved."

What readability score should I target for plain language?

For documents aimed at the general public, target a Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level of 6-8 and a Flesch Reading Ease of 60-70. For healthcare materials, the gold standard is grade 6 or below. For legal notices intended for consumers, grade 7-8 works well. The most important metric is improvement: reducing a grade-14 document to grade-8 makes it accessible to approximately 80% of the adult population instead of 30%.

What counts as jargon in text analysis?

This tool flags words and phrases commonly overused in business, legal, academic, and technical writing when simpler alternatives exist. Examples include "utilize" (use), "facilitate" (help), "commence" (start), "terminate" (end), "pursuant to" (under), "in the event that" (if), "notwithstanding" (despite), and "aforementioned" (this). These words are not wrong, but replacing them with plain equivalents improves readability without losing meaning.

Does this tool automatically rewrite my text?

No. This tool analyzes your original text and identifies specific issues — passive voice, long sentences, jargon, and complex words — but you write the simplified version yourself. The side-by-side layout lets you paste the original on the left, type your rewrite on the right, and compare readability scores in real time. This human-in-the-loop approach ensures meaning, tone, and domain accuracy are preserved while complexity is reduced.

Related Tools

ML

Michael Lip

Solo developer building free, privacy-first writing and developer tools. All Enhio tools run client-side with zero tracking. Part of the Zovo Tools network.